Which statement best describes an intranet's security and fault tolerance?

Which statement best describes an intranet's security and fault tolerance?

• A. Intranets are typically more secure but often less fault-tolerant.
• B. Intranets are less secure but more fault-tolerant.
• C. Intranets are equally secure and fault-tolerant as public networks.
• D. Intranets are more secure and more fault-tolerant.

Answer: (A)

An intranet is a private network that sits behind a company’s security measures, like firewalls, strict access controls, and centralized authentication. Because only authorized employees and devices can reach its resources, it tends to be more secure than a public network where anyone on the internet can attempt access. However, that same private setup can be less fault-tolerant if the internal infrastructure isn’t designed with broad redundancy. If a core switch, server, or link inside the organization fails, there may not be as many alternate routes or providers to keep services running unless extra redundancy is built in. So the idea that intranets offer stronger security while sometimes sacrificing fault tolerance relative to wide-open public networks is the best way to describe their typical trade-offs.

An intranet is a private network that sits behind a company’s security measures, like firewalls, strict access controls, and centralized authentication. Because only authorized employees and devices can reach its resources, it tends to be more secure than a public network where anyone on the internet can attempt access. However, that same private setup can be less fault-tolerant if the internal infrastructure isn’t designed with broad redundancy. If a core switch, server, or link inside the organization fails, there may not be as many alternate routes or providers to keep services running unless extra redundancy is built in. So the idea that intranets offer stronger security while sometimes sacrificing fault tolerance relative to wide-open public networks is the best way to describe their typical trade-offs.